.png)
Connect Lever and Rippling to automate the handoff from offer acceptance to day-one readiness — triggering payroll setup, IT provisioning, and onboarding tasks from a single hire event in your ATS.
The Lever-to-Rippling integration follows the same configuration approach as Greenhouse: we start by mapping every field in the client's Lever offer templates to the corresponding Rippling employee attributes. Standard fields are straightforward; custom offer fields need explicit mapping. We then connect the integration via Lever's API, design the Rippling onboarding workflow that fires on the hire event, and run test hire scenarios before go-live.
For companies with multi-entity or international hiring, we build entity-routing logic so Canadian and international hires route to the correct Rippling entity and payroll configuration automatically — rather than defaulting to the US primary entity.
Lever is used across US, Canadian, and global hiring teams. For US companies, the standard Greenhouse-style hire-to-HRIS handoff applies — offer acceptance triggers the Rippling onboarding flow. For Canadian companies using Lever, confirm that the Rippling onboarding workflow routes Canadian hires to the correct Canadian entity and payroll schedule — the same entity-routing logic required for Greenhouse applies here. French language offer templates and Quebec-specific onboarding requirements may also need to be configured in Rippling separately from the Lever integration.
When a candidate is marked as hired in Lever, candidate and offer data — name, email, job title, start date, department, manager, and compensation — pushes into Rippling to create an employee record and trigger the onboarding workflow. From there, Rippling fires payroll setup, benefits enrollment, IT provisioning, and onboarding task assignment automatically. Lever also benefits from bidirectional provisioning: Rippling can provision and suspend Lever accounts for recruiters and hiring managers based on their role.
Lever and Greenhouse both integrate with Rippling via an ATS-to-HRIS hire handoff model. The primary differences are in the recruiting experience rather than the Rippling integration mechanics. Lever offers a more candidate-centric CRM-style ATS with stronger relationship management features; Greenhouse is more structured and interview-process-focused. From Rippling's perspective, both trigger the same onboarding workflow on hire — the integration setup and field mapping process is similar for both.
Lever is particularly well-suited for companies that do a significant volume of relationship-based hiring — where recruiters maintain ongoing relationships with passive candidates across multiple roles. Its CRM-style pipeline management and candidate nurturing capabilities are stronger than Greenhouse for this use case. For companies that prioritize structured interviewing processes, Greenhouse is typically the stronger choice. Both integrate well with Rippling for the post-hire handoff.
Lever's custom offer fields map to Rippling employee attributes during integration setup — the same custom field mapping process as Greenhouse. Fields that don't have native Rippling equivalents need custom attributes created in Rippling before the integration is configured. Standard fields (name, email, title, start date, department, manager, compensation) map automatically; everything else requires explicit mapping.
Yes — the Lever-to-Rippling handoff is a standard ATS integration we configure as part of Rippling implementations for clients using Lever. We handle the API connection, field mapping between Lever offer fields and Rippling employee attributes, onboarding workflow design triggered by the hire event, and pre-launch testing with simulated hire scenarios including edge cases like rehires and international hires.
